Offer the claim at sign-up and after sign-in #388
Labels
No labels
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
spec
wayfinder:grilling
wayfinder:map
wayfinder:prototype
wayfinder:research
wayfinder:task
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Blocks
Depends on
#389 Read an Account's profile and its decided Games over the wire, in an ADR superseding 0034
amaurycoudr/chess-project
#387 Offer the claim on "My games", and forget a claimed Guest on sign-out
amaurycoudr/chess-project
Reference
amaurycoudr/chess-project#388
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Parent
#365
What to build
A Player signing up in a browser whose Guest owns Games sees a choice on the form, ticked by default, to add them to the new Account, naming how many. A Player signing in to an existing Account in such a browser gets a dialog: "Add N games to your account?", with "Add them" and "Not now". Either way the Games then show in "My games" on every browser of the Account. The e2e spec walks both paths and a second device.
unclaimedwith at least one Game, the form shows the choice. After sign-up succeeds with it ticked, the view claims through #387's mutation. Unticked claims nothing. A failed claim leaves the Account signed in, shows a toast and leaves the banner on "My games". The sign-up procedure itself is not changed.unclaimedand at least one Game, the dialog asks. "Not now" changes nothing, and the dialog shows again at the next sign-in. A failed claim shows a toast and leaves the banner on "My games".Seam: The front views (sign-up and sign-in views) and e2e
Acceptance criteria
mentioned in issue #389
mentioned in issue #365
mentioned in issue #387
marked this issue as related to #365
marked this issue as related to #387
marked this issue as related to #389
mentioned in merge request !529
Delivered by !529, merged into main.
mentioned in commit
215cdba4c9mentioned in merge request !537